XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L
XQUA.L (Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XQUA.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XQUA.L returned 0.95%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XQUA.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQUA.L achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XQUA.L has underperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 0.95%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.85% annualized return.
XQUA.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 8.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 0.94% | 10.82% | -0.40% | 7.51% | -17.76% | -1.45% | 6.97% | 10.02% | -6.59% | 4.54% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQUA.L and XDWH.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XQUA.L
XDWH.L
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQUA.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.11 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 2.80 | +4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQUA.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.79 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.32 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.52 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.57 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQUA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWH.L drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUA.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQUA.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.27% | -26.24% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.02% | -10.39% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.21% | -19.28% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -19.28% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.27% | -26.24% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -5.82% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -4.98% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 4.12% | -3.00% |
Volatility
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) is 1.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that XQUA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQUA.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 4.80% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 10.77% | -7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 14.57% | -9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.01% | 14.18% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.65% | 14.97% | -6.32% |
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQUA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQUA.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
XQUA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 4.61% | 4.49% | 4.61% | 4.24% | 6.92% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQUA.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUA.L.
XQUA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XQUA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XQUA.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for XQUA.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer