PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUA.DE achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than JPBM.DE's 4.40% return.


XQUA.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.44%
6M
2.55%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
1.36%

JPBM.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.64%
6M
3.84%
YTD
4.40%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
3.11%-1.36%5.24%3.95%-12.55%6.78%-2.76%17.84%8.45%
JPBM.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
4.40%0.87%7.74%5.71%-10.77%5.50%-4.06%21.24%-15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XQUA.DE and JPBM.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.77

The correlation between XQUA.DE and JPBM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUA.DE
XQUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JPBM.DE
JPBM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JPBM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XQUA.DEJPBM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.59

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

10.32

-4.53

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the JPBM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUA.DE and JPBM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, smaller than the maximum JPBM.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUA.DE and JPBM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUA.DEJPBM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-25.94%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-3.07%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

-12.49%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

-14.10%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-1.44%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-9.22%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.07%

+0.28%

Volatility

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQUA.DEJPBM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.67%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

4.03%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.22%

5.91%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

8.48%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.81%

14.85%

-6.04%

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQUA.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JPBM.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQUA.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Dividend Comparison

XQUA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than JPBM.DE's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPBM.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
5.80%6.24%5.67%5.42%5.58%3.96%4.40%4.40%4.04%0.00%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
4.52%4.80%4.40%4.34%7.07%3.83%4.92%4.19%3.08%3.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQUA.DE and JPBM.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPBM.DE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPBM.DE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUA.DE.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XQUA.DE and 0.39% for JPBM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQUA.DE and JPBM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer