PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUA.DE achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than IUS7.DE's 2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XQUA.DE has underperformed IUS7.DE with an annualized return of 1.37%, while IUS7.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.08% annualized return.


XQUA.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.67%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
1.89%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
1.37%

IUS7.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.33%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
3.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
1.67%-1.83%4.80%3.61%-12.81%6.04%-3.38%17.25%0.48%-5.38%
IUS7.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.97%1.14%11.74%6.77%-13.16%5.75%-4.03%18.79%-1.16%-3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016

0.93

The correlation between XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUA.DE
XQUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS7.DE
IUS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IUS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQUA.DEIUS7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.00

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

9.17

-5.63

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the IUS7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQUA.DEIUS7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.55

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.33

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.28

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.61

-0.45

Drawdowns

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum IUS7.DE drawdown of -27.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUA.DEIUS7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-27.13%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-3.09%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.44%

-12.95%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

-15.90%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

-27.13%

+6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

0.00%

-8.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-6.48%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.01%

+0.48%

Volatility

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) is 1.13%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that XQUA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUS7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQUA.DEIUS7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.24%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

4.03%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

5.97%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.31%

8.56%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.85%

11.02%

-2.17%

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

XQUA.DE vs. IUS7.DE - Dividend Comparison

XQUA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than IUS7.DE's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS7.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.80%6.10%5.62%5.77%5.63%3.80%4.17%4.72%4.70%5.11%5.29%4.71%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
3.90%4.38%4.01%4.02%6.75%3.16%4.33%3.72%2.50%3.53%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

XQUA.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while IUS7.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQUA.DE and IUS7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer