XQQU.TO vs. QTOP
XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from iShares - XQQU.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while QTOP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XQQU.TO returned 43.63% vs 47.87% for QTOP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XQQU.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QTOP.
Performance
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XQQU.TO is traded in CAD, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQQU.TO achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 24.27% return.
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTOP
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 12.95%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 47.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.83% | 15.17% | 7.91% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 24.27% | 16.59% | 9.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QTOP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank
XQQU.TO
QTOP
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQQU.TO | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 2.82 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | 3.62 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.49 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.60 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 11.05 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQQU.TO | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.82 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 1.53 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QTOP drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and QTOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQU.TO | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -23.40% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -13.37% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -4.55% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 4.34% | -0.55% |
Volatility
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) is 4.36%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that XQQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQU.TO | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 5.17% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 13.12% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 17.08% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 22.23% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 22.23% | -2.46% |
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQU.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQQU.TO vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison
XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than QTOP's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQQU.TO and QTOP have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQU.TO.
XQQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQU.TO and 0.20% for QTOP.
Find the right allocation for XQQU.TO and QTOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer