XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO
XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and QQQL.TO (Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from iShares and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XQQU.TO returned 43.63% vs 57.03% for QQQL.TO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XQQU.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQL.TO.
Performance
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQQU.TO achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly lower than QQQL.TO's 28.52% return.
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 16.49%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 57.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.83% | 15.17% | 18.09% |
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 28.52% | 16.16% | 24.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QQQL.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QQQL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XQQU.TO
QQQL.TO
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQQU.TO | QQQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 3.04 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | 4.01 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.69 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 4.52 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 11.91 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQQU.TO | QQQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 3.04 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 1.39 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQL.TO drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and QQQL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQU.TO | QQQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -27.82% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -12.69% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -4.88% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 4.80% | -1.01% |
Volatility
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) is 4.36%, while Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that XQQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQU.TO | QQQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 5.60% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 13.85% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 18.89% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 25.71% | -5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 25.71% | -5.94% |
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQU.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQL.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQQU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Dividend Comparison
XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while QQQL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQQU.TO and QQQL.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XQQU.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XQQU.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQL.TO.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQU.TO and 0.49% for QQQL.TO.
Find the right allocation for XQQU.TO and QQQL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer