XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while NVDA.TO (Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)) is a stock. Over the past year, XQQU.TO returned 43.63% vs 48.72% for NVDA.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQQU.TO achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA.TO's 14.32% return.

XQQU.TO

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 13.16%
• YTD: 22.83%
• 6M: 19.29%
• 1Y: 43.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA.TO

• 1D: -3.51%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 6M: 18.33%
• 1Y: 48.72%
• 3Y*: 72.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	22.83%	15.17%	36.07%	6.90%
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)	14.32%	34.82%	167.13%	8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQU.TO and NVDA.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.63

The correlation between XQQU.TO and NVDA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQQU.TO

XQQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
XQQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XQQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XQQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
XQQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XQQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

NVDA.TO

NVDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NVDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XQQU.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	1.49	+1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	2.12	+1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.25	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	2.33	+1.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	5.63	+5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQQU.TO and NVDA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XQQU.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81	1.49	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	1.24	+0.37

Drawdowns

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum NVDA.TO drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and NVDA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQQU.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.68%	-61.15%	+38.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.16%	-21.05%	+8.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.77%	+8.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-15.32%	+11.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	8.69%	-4.90%

Volatility

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) is 4.36%, while Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) has a volatility of 12.46%. This indicates that XQQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XQQU.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	12.46%	-8.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.78%	24.90%	-13.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.61%	32.87%	-17.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	51.67%	-31.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	51.67%	-31.90%

Dividends

XQQU.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, more than NVDA.TO's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.11%
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF	0.21%	0.26%	0.20%	0.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XQQU.TO and NVDA.TO in my portfolio?

XQQU.TO and NVDA.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.