PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQQI vs. NIHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQQI vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XQQI

1D
-3.90%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NIHI

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.15%
YTD
5.71%
6M
5.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XQQI and NIHI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQQI vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XQQI vs. NIHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, which is greater than NIHI's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and NIHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQQINIHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-10.88%

-2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.00%

-1.64%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-2.29%

-0.66%

Volatility

XQQI vs. NIHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQQINIHIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.52%

15.27%

+11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.52%

15.27%

+11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.52%

15.27%

+11.25%

XQQI vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQQI vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, less than NIHI's 8.72% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XQQI and NIHI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NIHI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NIHI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

NIHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.72%, compared with 8.24% for XQQI.

XQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while NIHI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.68% for NIHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQI and NIHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer