PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQQI vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQQI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XQQI

1D
-3.90%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPI

1D
1.09%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
19.61%
6M
18.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XQQI and MLPI is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQQI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XQQI vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and MLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQQIMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-5.38%

-8.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.00%

-2.18%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-1.49%

-1.46%

Volatility

XQQI vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQQIMLPIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.52%

13.05%

+13.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.52%

13.05%

+13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.52%

13.05%

+13.47%

XQQI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQQI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than MLPI's 7.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XQQI and MLPI have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 7.19% for MLPI.

XQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MLPI is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.68% for MLPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQI and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer