PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XQQ.TO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XQQ.TO returned 20.22%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPMO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQQ.TO achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XQQ.TO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 20.22%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.90% annualized return.

XQQ.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
0.89%
YTD
16.05%
6M
13.71%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
20.22%

SPMO

1D
1.49%
1M
6.37%
YTD
30.81%
6M
30.60%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
43.67%
5Y*
27.13%
10Y*
21.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		16.05%15.77%24.69%53.25%-33.13%22.76%46.12%38.92%-1.32%33.41%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF		30.89%20.80%58.16%14.76%-4.78%22.58%25.21%20.74%7.41%19.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQ.TO and SPMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.65

The correlation between XQQ.TO and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XQQ.TO
SPMO

Technology

53.7%
54.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.0%

Healthcare

4.2%
6.2%

Industrials

3.1%
10.9%

Utilities

1.4%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.6%

Energy

0.6%
3.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
5.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.9%

Technology

XQQ.TO
53.7%
SPMO
54.8%

Communication Services

XQQ.TO
15.8%
SPMO
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XQQ.TO
12.2%
SPMO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

XQQ.TO
7.7%
SPMO
4.0%

Healthcare

XQQ.TO
4.2%
SPMO
6.2%

Industrials

XQQ.TO
3.1%
SPMO
10.9%

Utilities

XQQ.TO
1.4%
SPMO
2.5%

Basic Materials

XQQ.TO
1.1%
SPMO
1.6%

Energy

XQQ.TO
0.6%
SPMO
3.1%

Financial Services

XQQ.TO
0.2%
SPMO
5.7%

Real Estate

XQQ.TO
0.1%
SPMO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF

Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO
Often compared with SPMO:
SPMO vs. VOOSPMO vs. QQQSPMO vs. SCHGSPMO vs. MTUMSPMO vs. VUGSPMO vs. VFMOSPMO vs. XMMO

Return for Risk

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XQQ.TOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.75
2.38

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.30
3.17

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.63

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

12.12

-5.34

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQQ.TO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.25%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -26.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQ.TO and SPMO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XQQ.TOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-26.80%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-12.95%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-21.35%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.25%

-21.43%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

-26.80%

-11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-0.73%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-4.16%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.87%

+0.55%

Volatility

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) is 7.44%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that XQQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XQQ.TOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

10.32%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

16.96%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

19.72%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.73%

20.54%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

21.56%

+0.95%

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQ.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

XQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SPMO's 0.67% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF		0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.22%0.25%0.67%0.93%1.27%0.52%0.80%1.44%1.61%1.64%2.35%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

XQQ.TO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

XQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPMO is Momentum. XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQ.TO and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQ.TO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer