PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XQQ.TO vs. IVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XQQ.TO returned 20.22%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for IVLU. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IVLU.

Performance

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while IVLU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IVLU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XQQ.TO having a 16.05% return and IVLU slightly lower at 15.25%. Over the past 10 years, XQQ.TO has outperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 20.22%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.

XQQ.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
1.70%
YTD
16.05%
6M
13.71%
1Y
31.56%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
20.22%

IVLU

1D
0.75%
1M
2.62%
YTD
15.25%
6M
15.97%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
25.38%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		16.05%15.77%24.69%53.25%-33.13%22.76%46.12%38.92%-1.32%33.41%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF		15.25%39.42%15.81%17.21%0.24%15.55%-6.76%10.84%-7.97%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQ.TO and IVLU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.48

The correlation between XQQ.TO and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XQQ.TO
IVLU

Technology

53.7%
10.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.0%

Healthcare

4.2%
9.0%

Industrials

3.1%
18.8%

Utilities

1.4%
3.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
7.4%

Energy

0.6%
5.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
26.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.4%

Technology

XQQ.TO
53.7%
IVLU
10.6%

Communication Services

XQQ.TO
15.8%
IVLU
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XQQ.TO
12.2%
IVLU
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

XQQ.TO
7.7%
IVLU
6.0%

Healthcare

XQQ.TO
4.2%
IVLU
9.0%

Industrials

XQQ.TO
3.1%
IVLU
18.8%

Utilities

XQQ.TO
1.4%
IVLU
3.6%

Basic Materials

XQQ.TO
1.1%
IVLU
7.4%

Energy

XQQ.TO
0.6%
IVLU
5.5%

Financial Services

XQQ.TO
0.2%
IVLU
26.5%

Real Estate

XQQ.TO
0.1%
IVLU
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF

Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO
Often compared with IVLU:
IVLU vs. DFIVIVLU vs. FIVAIVLU vs. VXUSIVLU vs. IDMOIVLU vs. IEFAIVLU vs. DISVIVLU vs. SFNNX

Return for Risk

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XQQ.TOIVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.75
2.30

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.30
3.14

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.22

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

12.32

-5.54

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the IVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQQ.TO and IVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.25%, which is greater than IVLU's maximum drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQ.TO and IVLU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XQQ.TOIVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-34.14%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-11.47%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-15.85%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.25%

-20.32%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

-34.14%

-4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

0.00%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-6.55%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.01%

+1.41%

Volatility

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) at 5.61%. This indicates that XQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XQQ.TOIVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

5.61%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

13.20%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

16.06%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.73%

17.64%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

18.66%

+3.85%

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQ.TO vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison

XQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than IVLU's 3.28% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF		3.28%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.22%0.25%0.67%0.93%1.27%0.52%0.80%1.44%1.61%1.64%2.35%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

XQQ.TO and IVLU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVLU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVLU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

XQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQ.TO and 0.30% for IVLU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQ.TO and IVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer