XPTFX vs. QAMNX
XPTFX (Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund) and QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) are both mutual funds - XPTFX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Federated, while QAMNX is a Long-Short fund managed by Federated. Over the past 3 years, XPTFX returned 8.05%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for QAMNX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPTFX charges 0.41%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QAMNX.
Performance
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPTFX achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's -0.14% return.
XPTFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
QAMNX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund | 2.83% | 7.47% | 8.62% | 8.55% | 3.74% | 0.40% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | -0.14% | 10.00% | 17.33% | 4.71% | 9.19% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPTFX and QAMNX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPTFX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank
XPTFX
QAMNX
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPTFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.27 | 1.10 | +3.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 0.76 | +3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.16 | 1.74 | +10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPTFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 0.48 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 0.82 | +1.54 |
Drawdowns
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPTFX drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum QAMNX drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPTFX and QAMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPTFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -17.97% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.96% | -4.16% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.95% | -4.16% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.16% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -5.15% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 1.80% | -1.18% |
Volatility
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) is 0.21%, while Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that XPTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPTFX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 2.24% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 5.11% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 6.66% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.52% | 13.86% | -11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.02% | 13.86% | -11.84% |
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPTFX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPTFX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison
XPTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than QAMNX's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.85% | 5.89% | 11.74% | 20.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund | 6.04% | 7.24% | 6.78% | 6.66% | 5.70% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 4.62% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPTFX and QAMNX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAMNX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to XPTFX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPTFX dropped -2.95% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.
XPTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPTFX and QAMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer