XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE
XPQP.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Xtrackers - XPQP.DE tracks the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Total Return Net Index while XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XPQP.DE returned -2.71%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPQP.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPQP.DE achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
XPQP.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -1.01%
- 1Y
- -12.08%
- 3Y*
- -3.20%
- 5Y*
- -2.71%
- 10Y*
- -3.84%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPQP.DE Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C | -2.31% | -10.06% | 3.70% | -2.43% | -11.20% | 6.79% | -11.66% | 10.20% | -12.98% | -0.45% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPQP.DE and XMME.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XPQP.DE
XMME.DE
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C (XPQP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPQP.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.55 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 4.98 | -5.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 18.04 | -19.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPQP.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 3.00 | -3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.51 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.45 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPQP.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPQP.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPQP.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.15% | -31.96% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.19% | -10.67% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -19.16% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | -24.38% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.03% | -1.04% | -40.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.75% | -9.53% | -17.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.82% | 2.95% | +7.87% |
Volatility
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C (XPQP.DE) is 6.03%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XPQP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPQP.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 7.48% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 14.90% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.33% | 17.70% | +10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 16.74% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 18.61% | +3.16% |
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPQP.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPQP.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPQP.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPQP.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XPQP.DE.
XPQP.DE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Total Return Net Index, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XPQP.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XPQP.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer