PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C (XPQP.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPQP.DE achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than UEF5.DE's 26.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XPQP.DE has underperformed UEF5.DE with an annualized return of -3.52%, while UEF5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.11% annualized return.


XPQP.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
3.73%
6M
0.72%
YTD
6.92%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
-0.00%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
-3.52%

UEF5.DE

1D
-1.88%
1M
-7.90%
6M
20.85%
YTD
26.81%
1Y
42.58%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPQP.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C
6.92%-10.34%3.57%-2.10%-11.18%6.62%-11.70%10.32%-12.92%4.71%
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
26.81%20.99%15.47%3.78%-15.32%6.96%5.36%14.51%-7.68%16.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XPQP.DE and UEF5.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2014

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between XPQP.DE and UEF5.DE has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPQP.DE
XPQP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XPQP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPQP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPQP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XPQP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPQP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

UEF5.DE
UEF5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C (XPQP.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPQP.DEUEF5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.36

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

3.90

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

12.42

-12.14

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPQP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPQP.DE and UEF5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPQP.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.97%, which is greater than UEF5.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPQP.DE and UEF5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPQP.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.97%

-38.64%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.86%

-10.88%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-20.35%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.14%

-24.36%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.30%

-36.70%

-13.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.53%

-10.88%

-25.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-13.27%

-11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

3.42%

+4.50%

Volatility

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C (XPQP.DE) is 5.21%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that XPQP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEF5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPQP.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

8.11%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.96%

18.39%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

21.01%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

18.11%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

18.98%

+2.73%

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPQP.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UEF5.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPQP.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Dividend Comparison

XPQP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEF5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.68%2.19%1.73%2.36%2.19%1.32%1.89%2.00%2.16%2.00%2.30%1.65%
XPQP.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Philippines UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPQP.DE and UEF5.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEF5.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEF5.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XPQP.DE.

XPQP.DE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Total Return Net Index, while UEF5.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XPQP.DE and 0.24% for UEF5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPQP.DE and UEF5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer