XPPT.DE vs. GLDI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XPPT.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities) and GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) are both exchange-traded funds - XPPT.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while GLDI is a Gold fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XPPT.DE returned 8.14%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for GLDI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPPT.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GLDI.

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while GLDI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -26.54% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's -3.21% return.

XPPT.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -16.57%
• YTD: -26.54%
• 6M: -26.47%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: —

GLDI

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -6.84%
• YTD: -3.21%
• 6M: -3.98%
• 1Y: 13.55%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: 7.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XPPT.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities	-26.54%	114.44%	-3.35%	-8.94%	16.19%	-1.94%	9.31%
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033	-3.21%	18.31%	25.54%	5.67%	5.02%	3.80%	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.DE and GLDI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020	0.27

The correlation between XPPT.DE and GLDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE

XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

GLDI

GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 20
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XPPT.DE	GLDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	0.88	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	1.18	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.19	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	0.99	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.13	3.10	-1.97

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the GLDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.DE and GLDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -27.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and GLDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPPT.DE	GLDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.74%	-27.73%	-14.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.74%	-13.78%	-27.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.74%	-13.78%	-27.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.74%	-13.78%	-27.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.74%	-13.01%	-28.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-8.81%	-6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.39%	4.37%	+15.02%

Volatility

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) at 6.91%. This indicates that XPPT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPPT.DE	GLDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.14%	6.91%	+3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.16%	14.11%	+26.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.09%	15.45%	+34.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.89%	11.36%	+20.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.28%	11.34%	+20.94%

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

XPPT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.21%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033	27.21%	16.15%	10.45%	10.02%	13.73%	10.65%	14.25%	7.25%	5.33%	7.77%	17.26%	10.07%
XPPT.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPPT.DE and GLDI in my portfolio?

XPPT.DE and GLDI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XPPT.DE or GLDI?

On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPPT.DE or GLDI?

XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GLDI.

What is the main difference between XPPT.DE and GLDI?

XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDI is Gold. XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.65% for GLDI.