PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPH vs. SPAQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XPH vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XPH vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
-3.32%31.60%4.94%-1.76%
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
0.06%7.35%4.33%5.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than SPAQ's 0.06% return.


XPH

1D
5.32%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
13.19%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
3.82%

SPAQ

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
0.06%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XPH vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XPH vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SPAQ
SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPH vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPHSPAQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.56

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

0.84

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.98

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.52

3.66

+1.86

XPH vs. SPAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the SPAQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPH and SPAQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPHSPAQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.56

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.78

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between XPH and SPAQ is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XPH vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison

XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than SPAQ's 16.68% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.69%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
16.68%16.69%3.00%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XPH vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and SPAQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XPHSPAQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.03%

-5.30%

-42.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.15%

-5.30%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.29%

-1.97%

-5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-0.53%

-16.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

1.41%

+3.82%

Volatility

XPH vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.75%. This indicates that XPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XPHSPAQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.49%

1.75%

+7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.38%

6.25%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.72%

8.60%

+16.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

7.04%

+13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

7.04%

+15.18%