XPH vs. MHIP
XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) and MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. XPH is passively managed, while MHIP is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MHIP.
Performance
XPH vs. MHIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XPH
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 1Y
- 59.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
MHIP
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPH vs. MHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 13.36% |
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPH and MHIP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPH vs. MHIP — Risk / Return Rank
XPH
MHIP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XPH vs. MHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPH | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPH vs. MHIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than MHIP's maximum drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and MHIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPH | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -3.09% | -44.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -1.48% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -1.25% | -15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility
XPH vs. MHIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPH | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 11.73% | +10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 11.73% | +9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 11.73% | +10.37% |
XPH vs. MHIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MHIP's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPH vs. MHIP - Dividend Comparison
XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while MHIP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.50% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPH and MHIP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MHIP.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for MHIP.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Milliman. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XPH and 0.55% for MHIP.
Find the right allocation for XPH and MHIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer