PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPH vs. BTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPH vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XPH

1D
1.10%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
0.66%
6M
4.44%
1Y
37.98%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
3.44%

BTEC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPH vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


XPH vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPH
BTEC

Healthcare

100.0%
99.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XPH
100.0%
BTEC
99.4%

Basic Materials

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Communication Services

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Energy

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Financial Services

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Industrials

XPH

-

BTEC
0.6%

Real Estate

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Technology

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Utilities

XPH

-

BTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPH vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPH vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPHBTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.37

XPH vs. BTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPHBTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

Drawdowns

XPH vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and BTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPHBTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.03%

0.00%

-48.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

0.00%

-7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

0.00%

-17.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

Volatility

XPH vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPHBTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.52%

0.00%

+21.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

0.00%

+20.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

0.00%

+22.10%

XPH vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPH vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTEC
Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.66%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.

XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XPH and 0.42% for BTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPH and BTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer