PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPF.TO achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than XAW.TO's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XPF.TO has underperformed XAW.TO with an annualized return of 4.08%, while XAW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.


XPF.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.67%
6M
3.54%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
4.08%

XAW.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.13%
YTD
13.70%
6M
12.70%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
2.67%9.33%14.80%7.19%-19.48%11.51%5.34%8.88%-7.32%10.03%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
13.70%15.87%26.31%18.45%-11.84%18.38%12.37%19.82%-2.28%16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XPF.TO and XAW.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.36

The correlation between XPF.TO and XAW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPF.TO
XAW.TO

Financial Services

31.6%
13.7%

Technology

6.7%
32.6%

Real Estate

5.9%
1.4%

Industrials

3.6%
9.1%

Utilities

1.5%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.8%

Communication Services

1.2%
8.7%

Healthcare

0.4%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
8.8%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

XPF.TO
31.6%
XAW.TO
13.7%

Technology

XPF.TO
6.7%
XAW.TO
32.6%

Real Estate

XPF.TO
5.9%
XAW.TO
1.4%

Industrials

XPF.TO
3.6%
XAW.TO
9.1%

Utilities

XPF.TO
1.5%
XAW.TO
2.2%

Basic Materials

XPF.TO
1.2%
XAW.TO
2.8%

Communication Services

XPF.TO
1.2%
XAW.TO
8.7%

Healthcare

XPF.TO
0.4%
XAW.TO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

XPF.TO
0.3%
XAW.TO
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XPF.TO
0.1%
XAW.TO
8.8%

Energy

XPF.TO

-

XAW.TO
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPF.TO
XPF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPF.TOXAW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.48

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.76

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

15.15

-5.52

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPF.TO and XAW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPF.TOXAW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.50

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.04

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.88

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.78

-0.49

Drawdowns

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPF.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, which is greater than XAW.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPF.TO and XAW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPF.TOXAW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-27.32%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-8.16%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.54%

-16.66%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-21.02%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-27.32%

-16.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.37%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-3.91%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

2.02%

-0.95%

Volatility

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) is 1.62%, while iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that XPF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPF.TOXAW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

4.21%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

9.85%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

12.25%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.52%

13.56%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

15.12%

-0.67%

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPF.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XAW.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPF.TO vs. XAW.TO - Dividend Comparison

XPF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than XAW.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.17%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
5.13%5.08%5.21%5.74%5.46%4.30%4.95%5.12%4.94%4.59%5.14%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPF.TO and XAW.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAW.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAW.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XPF.TO.

XPF.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XAW.TO is Global Equities. XPF.TO tracks S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR, while XAW.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XPF.TO and 0.22% for XAW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPF.TO and XAW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer