XPAY vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XPAY (Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XPAY returned 22.25% vs -28.95% for PLTW. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XPAY charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

XPAY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -37.29% return.

XPAY

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 9.13%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.18%

PLTW

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -4.02%
• 6M: -20.95%
• YTD: -37.29%
• 1Y: -28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -13.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.58M	$2.73M	$3.69M
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	$1.77M	$2.52M	$3.75M

XPAY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	11.32%	12.38%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-37.29%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and PLTW is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.48

XPAY vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XPAY	PLTW
Technology	38.5%	20.0%
Financial Services	11.6%	-
Communication Services	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Industrials	8.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

XPAY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XPAY

XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 74
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 78

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XPAY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XPAY	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	-0.46	+2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	-0.32	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.96	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	-0.51	+2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	-0.92	+11.09

XPAY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPAY	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-57.27%	+39.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.34%	-57.27%	+47.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-48.71%	+48.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-25.26%	+22.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	31.63%	-29.44%

Volatility

XPAY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 3.67%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 15.51%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPAY	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	15.51%	-11.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	48.86%	-38.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	62.65%	-49.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	73.45%	-56.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	73.45%	-56.89%

XPAY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPAY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.78%, less than PLTW's 137.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	137.47%	72.40%	0.00%
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	20.78%	21.21%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPAY and PLTW in my portfolio?

XPAY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XPAY or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to XPAY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, XPAY or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, XPAY leads with 22.25% vs -28.95% for PLTW. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XPAY or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, XPAY has performed better with a 22.25% return vs -28.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPAY or PLTW?

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPAY or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 20.78% for XPAY.

What is the main difference between XPAY and PLTW?

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.