PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XPAY vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XPAY vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
-3.96%16.78%3.17%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-11.04%22.99%15.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -11.04% return.


XPAY

1D
0.86%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.96%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
1.28%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-11.04%
6M
-8.69%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XPAY vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPAYMAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.97

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.58

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.60

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

5.57

+1.14

XPAY vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPAYMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.97

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.36

-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and MAGS is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XPAY vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.92%, more than MAGS's 1.66% yield.


TTM202520242023
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
22.92%21.21%3.40%0.00%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.66%1.48%0.81%0.44%

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and MAGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-29.91%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-18.62%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-13.78%

+7.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-4.77%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

5.36%

-2.73%

Volatility

XPAY vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 5.30%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XPAYMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

8.50%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

15.51%

-6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

28.70%

-10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

26.28%

-9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

26.28%

-9.03%