PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's -5.34% return.


XPAY

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
7.87%
6M
6.66%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDND

1D
0.03%
1M
-5.72%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
-3.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and FDND is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.74

The correlation between XPAY and FDND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPAYFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.98

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

-0.17

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

-0.41

+10.60

XPAY vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-24.12%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-20.49%

+11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-11.49%

+8.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-5.74%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

8.65%

-6.55%

Volatility

XPAY vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 4.75%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

7.14%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

14.99%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

18.95%

-6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

21.48%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

21.48%

-4.66%

XPAY vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.18%, more than FDND's 8.63% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XPAY and FDND have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to XPAY (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, XPAY leads with 21.40% vs -3.53% for FDND. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XPAY has performed better with a 21.40% return vs -3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FDND.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 21.18%, compared with 8.63% for FDND.

XPAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FDND is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.75% for FDND.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer