PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDND vs. GNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDND vs. GNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDND achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than GNOV's 5.01% return.


FDND

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.57%
YTD
2.42%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GNOV

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.91%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.54%
1Y
17.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDND vs. GNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDND and GNOV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.68

The correlation between FDND and GNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDND vs. GNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GNOV
GNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDND vs. GNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNDGNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.63

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

3.76

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

21.12

-20.24

FDND vs. GNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDND Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the GNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDND and GNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNDGNOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.97

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.68

-1.08

Drawdowns

FDND vs. GNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDND drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, which is greater than GNOV's maximum drawdown of -10.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDND and GNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNDGNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-10.70%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.49%

-4.56%

-15.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-0.11%

-4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-0.71%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.39%

0.81%

+7.58%

Volatility

FDND vs. GNOV - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) at 0.83%. This indicates that FDND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNDGNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

0.83%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

4.60%

+9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

5.78%

+12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

7.62%

+13.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

7.62%

+13.78%

FDND vs. GNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GNOV's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDND vs. GNOV - Dividend Comparison

FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, while GNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FDND and GNOV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to GNOV (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDND dropped -24.12% vs GNOV's -10.70%.

On 1-year performance, GNOV leads with 17.08% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GNOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GNOV has performed better with a 17.08% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GNOV.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for GNOV.

FDND is categorized as Technology Equities, while GNOV is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FDND and 0.85% for GNOV.

GNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDND and GNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer