XPAY vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XPAY (Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XPAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XPAY returned 21.40% vs 107.18% for CHAT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPAY charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

XPAY vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 62.42% return.

XPAY

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 62.42%
• 6M: 61.25%
• 1Y: 107.18%
• 3Y*: 51.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	7.87%	16.78%	1.60%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	62.42%	49.85%	3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and CHAT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024	0.77

The correlation between XPAY and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

XPAY vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XPAY	CHAT
Technology	39.0%	77.8%
Financial Services	11.1%	0.0%
Communication Services	10.6%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	2.4%
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.8%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

XPAY vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY

XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 57
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 57
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XPAY	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	3.10	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.36	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.47	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	6.62	-4.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.19	18.29	-8.09

XPAY vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPAY	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-31.34%	+13.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.34%	-16.28%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-7.99%	+4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-5.39%	+3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	5.88%	-3.78%

Volatility

XPAY vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 4.75%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPAY	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	19.26%	-14.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	29.49%	-19.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.37%	34.88%	-22.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	31.21%	-14.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	31.21%	-14.39%

XPAY vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPAY vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.18%, more than CHAT's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.76%	2.85%	0.00%
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	21.18%	21.21%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPAY and CHAT in my portfolio?

XPAY and CHAT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XPAY or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to XPAY (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, XPAY or CHAT?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 107.18% vs 21.40% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XPAY or CHAT?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 107.18% return vs 21.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPAY or CHAT?

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPAY or CHAT?

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 21.18%, compared with 1.76% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between XPAY and CHAT?

XPAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.