PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XONE vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XONE vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XONE achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.


XONE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.47%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XONE vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
1.11%4.41%4.83%4.74%0.60%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XONE and YCS is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XONE vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XONE
XONE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XONE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XONE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XONE vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XONEYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+14.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.57

1.35

+2.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.16

3.97

+20.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

138.74

12.40

+126.34

XONE vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XONE Sharpe Ratio is 7.06, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XONE and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XONEYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06

1.92

+5.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.96

0.33

+4.63

Drawdowns

XONE vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XONE drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XONE and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XONEYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-49.56%

+49.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-8.30%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.28%

-23.05%

+22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-19.93%

+19.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

2.66%

-2.63%

Volatility

XONE vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) is 0.10%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that XONE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XONEYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

2.75%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.34%

12.32%

-11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55%

17.27%

-16.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.86%

21.10%

-20.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

19.01%

-18.15%

XONE vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XONE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

XONE vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

XONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.06%4.33%5.21%4.46%1.17%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XONE and YCS have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to XONE (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XONE dropped -0.40% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 19.84% vs 4.57% for XONE. On fees, XONE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XONE has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 19.84% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XONE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

XONE has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

XONE is categorized as Government Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. XONE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XONE and 1.00% for YCS.

XONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XONE and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer