PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMX vs. NVDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMX vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMX achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than NVDU's -2.97% return.


XOMX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-13.46%
YTD
20.25%
6M
19.82%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDU

1D
3.33%
1M
-16.94%
YTD
-2.97%
6M
-4.84%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMX vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOMX and NVDU is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMX vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMX
XOMX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMX vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMXNVDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.50

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

1.08

+1.79

XOMX vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMX and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMX vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMX drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, smaller than the maximum NVDU drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMX and NVDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMXNVDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-67.27%

+27.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.41%

-42.27%

+2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.41%

-33.91%

-5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-19.00%

+9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

19.76%

-5.64%

Volatility

XOMX vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) is 15.71%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 26.55%. This indicates that XOMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMXNVDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.71%

26.55%

-10.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.54%

52.65%

-10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.41%

70.13%

-20.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.28%

90.85%

-42.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.28%

90.85%

-42.57%

XOMX vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMX vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

XOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than NVDU's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
6.08%5.68%16.85%0.63%
XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
2.19%1.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMX and NVDU have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDU has higher volatility (26.55%) compared to XOMX (15.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMX dropped -39.41% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

On 1-year performance, XOMX leads with 40.32% vs 21.23% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, XOMX has been the lower-risk option at 15.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMX has performed better with a 40.32% return vs 21.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XOMX.

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 2.19% for XOMX.

Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XOMX and 1.04% for NVDU.

XOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMX and NVDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer