PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. SKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. SKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XOM

1D
0.28%
1M
-6.91%
YTD
23.81%
6M
25.40%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
23.23%
10Y*
9.64%

SKX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. SKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
23.81%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%-6.11%7.86%48.61%-3.34%20.76%-16.79%88.69%-39.51%53.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and SKX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 1999

0.24

The correlation between XOM and SKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XOM:

$614.94B

SKX:

$9.55B

EPS

XOM:

$5.93

SKX:

$4.40

PE Ratio

XOM:

24.80

SKX:

14.35

PEG Ratio

XOM:

1.15

SKX:

0.09

PS Ratio

XOM:

1.93

SKX:

1.01

PB Ratio

XOM:

2.42

SKX:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

XOM:

$326.01B

SKX:

$9.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XOM:

$83.11B

SKX:

$4.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

XOM:

$60.44B

SKX:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. SKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. SKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMSKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

XOM vs. SKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. SKX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

Volatility

XOM vs. SKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

Dividends

XOM vs. SKX - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while SKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.78%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. SKX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
83.16B
2.44B
(XOM) Total Revenue
(SKX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XOM vs. SKX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
37.7%
53.3%
Portfolio components
XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

SKX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.30B and revenue of 2.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

SKX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported an operating income of 173.08M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

SKX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a net income of 170.50M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and SKX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and SKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer