XOM vs. PDBC

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, XOM returned 8.48%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for PDBC. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XOM vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 8.48%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.69% annualized return.

XOM

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -5.27%
• 6M: 12.96%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 1Y: 24.15%
• 3Y*: 13.15%
• 5Y*: 22.21%
• 10Y*: 8.48%

PDBC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -4.64%
• 6M: 21.24%
• YTD: 24.08%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	16.96%	15.98%	11.26%	-6.26%	87.41%	57.58%	-36.21%	7.23%	-15.09%	-3.81%
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	24.08%	5.96%	2.09%	-6.25%	19.23%	41.72%	-7.84%	11.44%	-12.78%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and PDBC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014	0.53

The correlation between XOM and PDBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XOM vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM

XOM Risk / Return Rank: 71
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PDBC

PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 51
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOM	PDBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.55	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.13	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.27	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.75	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.24	6.25	-3.01

XOM vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XOM vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and PDBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOM	PDBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.40%	-49.52%	-12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.11%	-16.55%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.11%	-16.55%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.51%	-27.63%	+7.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.34%	-40.73%	-20.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.46%	-13.06%	-5.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-23.11%	+12.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.65%	4.64%	+3.01%

Volatility

XOM vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 5.48%. This indicates that XOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOM	PDBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	5.48%	+2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.76%	16.59%	+4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.73%	18.72%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.71%	19.19%	+7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.25%	17.75%	+10.50%

Dividends

XOM vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than PDBC's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.09%	3.84%	4.42%	4.21%	13.05%	50.83%	0.01%	1.40%	1.00%	3.83%	6.51%	0.00%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	2.94%	3.32%	3.57%	3.68%	3.22%	5.70%	8.44%	4.92%	4.74%	3.66%	3.30%	3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOM and PDBC in my portfolio?

XOM and PDBC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOM or PDBC?

XOM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to PDBC (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.