PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Deere & Company (DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XOM having a 26.26% return and DE slightly lower at 25.68%. Over the past 10 years, XOM has underperformed DE with an annualized return of 9.82%, while DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.89% annualized return.


XOM

1D
-1.39%
1M
1.51%
YTD
26.26%
6M
30.38%
1Y
51.92%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
24.00%
10Y*
9.82%

DE

1D
-1.40%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
25.68%
6M
23.59%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
22.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
26.26%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
DE
Deere & Company
25.68%11.39%7.56%-5.48%26.59%28.86%57.96%18.30%-2.90%54.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 1978

0.33

The correlation between XOM and DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

XOM:

$5.93

DE:

$17.76

PE Ratio

XOM:

25.29

DE:

32.86

PEG Ratio

XOM:

1.17

DE:

7.72

PS Ratio

XOM:

1.96

DE:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

XOM:

$326.01B

DE:

$46.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XOM:

$83.11B

DE:

$16.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

XOM:

$60.44B

DE:

$11.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DE
DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Deere & Company (DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

0.79

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

1.68

+7.67

XOM vs. DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.53

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.40

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.76

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.39

+0.09

Drawdowns

XOM vs. DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum DE drawdown of -73.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-73.27%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-19.90%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-21.59%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-33.81%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

-37.91%

-23.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.97%

-11.67%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-18.62%

+8.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.57%

9.39%

-3.82%

Volatility

XOM vs. DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 9.27%, while Deere & Company (DE) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

10.26%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

24.25%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.48%

29.83%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

29.36%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.18%

30.37%

-2.19%

Dividends

XOM vs. DE - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than DE's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DE
Deere & Company
1.11%1.39%1.42%1.33%1.05%1.14%1.13%1.75%1.84%1.53%2.33%3.15%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.72%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Deere & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
83.16B
9.61B
(XOM) Total Revenue
(DE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XOM vs. DE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Deere & Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
37.7%
34.7%
Portfolio components
XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

DE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a gross profit of 3.33B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

DE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

DE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DE has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to XOM (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs DE's -73.27%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer