XOM vs. COMT
XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock, while COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, XOM returned 10.67%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for COMT. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
XOM vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XOM having a 30.91% return and COMT slightly higher at 31.11%. Over the past 10 years, XOM has outperformed COMT with an annualized return of 10.67%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.
XOM
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 14.06%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 1Y
- 43.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 26.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
COMT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 19.02%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.08M | $10.46M | $14.41M | |
| $2.16B | $2.15B | $2.46B |
XOM vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 30.91% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 31.11% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 10.81% | -6.67% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOM and COMT is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XOM and COMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOM vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
XOM
COMT
XOM vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOM | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.82 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 5.69 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOM vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOM | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -51.89% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.11% | -17.57% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -17.57% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.51% | -29.00% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.01% | -39.22% | -21.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.73% | -10.65% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -23.90% | +13.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 5.63% | +2.32% |
Volatility
XOM vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.08%. This indicates that XOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOM | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 5.08% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 19.62% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.02% | 21.67% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 21.10% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 18.86% | +9.42% |
Dividends
XOM vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than COMT's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.90% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.62% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOM and COMT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to COMT (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs COMT's -51.89%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOM and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer