PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 9.64%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 40.96% annualized return.


XOM

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
23.81%
6M
25.40%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
23.23%
10Y*
9.64%

AVGO

1D
-0.91%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
10.62%
6M
6.58%
1Y
50.41%
3Y*
67.17%
5Y*
55.09%
10Y*
40.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
23.81%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
10.62%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and AVGO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.24

The correlation between XOM and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XOM:

$614.94B

AVGO:

$1.86T

EPS

XOM:

$5.93

AVGO:

$6.01

PE Ratio

XOM:

24.80

AVGO:

63.58

PEG Ratio

XOM:

1.15

AVGO:

0.79

PS Ratio

XOM:

1.93

AVGO:

24.70

PB Ratio

XOM:

2.42

AVGO:

21.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

XOM:

$326.01B

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XOM:

$83.11B

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

XOM:

$60.44B

AVGO:

$41.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.77

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

4.11

+2.45

XOM vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-48.30%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-28.67%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-41.15%

+22.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-41.15%

+20.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

-48.30%

-13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.68%

-20.66%

+6.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-7.98%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

12.30%

-6.46%

Volatility

XOM vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 9.08%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 20.53%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

20.53%

-11.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

35.04%

-14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

45.57%

-21.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.77%

43.39%

-16.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

39.52%

-11.32%

Dividends

XOM vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than AVGO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.65%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.78%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
83.16B
22.19B
(XOM) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XOM vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
37.7%
67.2%
Portfolio components
XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and AVGO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to XOM (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer