PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. ABR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. ABR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -28.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has outperformed ABR with an annualized return of 9.64%, while ABR has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.


XOM

1D
0.28%
1M
-6.91%
YTD
23.81%
6M
25.40%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
23.23%
10Y*
9.64%

ABR

1D
0.97%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-28.34%
6M
-37.31%
1Y
-43.06%
3Y*
-19.02%
5Y*
-13.68%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
23.81%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
-28.34%-36.65%3.16%29.73%-20.73%39.42%10.04%55.19%30.04%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and ABR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2004

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between XOM and ABR has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XOM:

$614.94B

ABR:

$1.10B

EPS

XOM:

$5.93

ABR:

$0.57

PE Ratio

XOM:

24.80

ABR:

9.09

PS Ratio

XOM:

1.93

ABR:

1.17

PB Ratio

XOM:

2.42

ABR:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

XOM:

$326.01B

ABR:

$940.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XOM:

$83.11B

ABR:

$829.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

XOM:

$60.44B

ABR:

$878.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ABR
ABR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ABR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ABR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMABRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.81

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

-0.81

+3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

-1.56

+8.12

XOM vs. ABR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the ABR Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and ABR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and ABR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMABRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-97.76%

+35.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-54.29%

+38.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-59.07%

+40.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-59.07%

+38.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

-72.76%

+11.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.68%

-58.68%

+45.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-41.87%

+31.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

28.20%

-22.36%

Volatility

XOM vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 9.08%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMABRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

12.68%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

34.16%

-13.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

41.32%

-16.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.77%

37.22%

-10.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

40.46%

-12.26%

Dividends

XOM vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than ABR's 20.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
20.54%17.14%12.42%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%11.22%8.33%8.31%8.11%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.78%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. ABR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
83.16B
25.74M
(XOM) Total Revenue
(ABR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XOM vs. ABR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
37.7%
-85.3%
Portfolio components
XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

ABR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

ABR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

ABR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and ABR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABR has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to XOM (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs ABR's -97.76%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and ABR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer