XOEX vs. SCHX
XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XOEX tracks the S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XOEX returned 18.33%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOEX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
XOEX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
XOEX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
XOEX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 9.69% | 18.97% | 12.07% | 15.99% | 2.98% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEX and SCHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XOEX and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOEX vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOEX
SCHX
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XOEX
SCHX
Healthcare
XOEX
SCHX
Financial Services
XOEX
SCHX
Industrials
XOEX
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
XOEX
SCHX
Communication Services
XOEX
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
XOEX
SCHX
Energy
XOEX
SCHX
Utilities
XOEX
SCHX
Basic Materials
XOEX
SCHX
Real Estate
XOEX
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
XOEX
SCHX
XOEX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOEX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 3.05 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.43 | 13.85 | +1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.29 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.85 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
XOEX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -34.33% | +19.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -9.02% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -19.04% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.70% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -3.97% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.98% | -0.15% |
Volatility
XOEX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that XOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 2.91% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 9.02% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 11.99% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 17.12% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 18.15% | -4.73% |
XOEX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 1.60% | 1.95% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEX and SCHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOEX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 22.38% vs 18.33% for XOEX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 22.38% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XOEX.
XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.03% for SCHX.
XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOEX and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer