XOEX vs. COMT
XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. XOEX is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XOEX returned 18.54%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for COMT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOEX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
XOEX vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 38.58% return.
XOEX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 38.58%
- 6M
- 38.42%
- 1Y
- 47.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
XOEX vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 10.27% | 18.97% | 12.07% | 15.99% | 2.98% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 38.58% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEX and COMT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XOEX and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOEX vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOEX
COMT
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
XOEX
COMT
-
Healthcare
XOEX
COMT
-
Financial Services
XOEX
COMT
Industrials
XOEX
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
XOEX
COMT
-
Communication Services
XOEX
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOEX
COMT
-
Energy
XOEX
COMT
-
Utilities
XOEX
COMT
-
Basic Materials
XOEX
COMT
-
Real Estate
XOEX
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEX vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
XOEX
COMT
XOEX vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOEX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 2.22 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | 2.86 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 6.26 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 14.93 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.22 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.20 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
XOEX vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -51.89% | +37.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -8.02% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -13.31% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.56% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -24.08% | +21.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 3.36% | -1.53% |
Volatility
XOEX vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) is 3.39%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that XOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 7.60% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 18.80% | -10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 21.38% | -10.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 21.07% | -7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 18.89% | -5.47% |
XOEX vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEX vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than COMT's 5.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.59% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 1.59% | 1.95% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEX and COMT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to XOEX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, XOEX leads with 18.54% vs 16.55% for COMT. On fees, XOEX is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XOEX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XOEX has performed better with a 18.54% return vs 16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOEX is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 1.59% for XOEX.
XOEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.48% for COMT.
XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOEX and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer