PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOCT vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOCT vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October (XOCT) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOCT achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.


XOCT

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.49%
YTD
4.34%
6M
5.08%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOCT vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOCT and QQQY is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2023

0.78

The correlation between XOCT and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOCT vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOCT
XOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOCT vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October (XOCT) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOCTQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.68

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

3.37

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.49

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.28

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.33

13.95

+4.38

XOCT vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOCT and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOCTQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.68

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.25

+0.28

Drawdowns

XOCT vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOCT drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOCT and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOCTQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-19.05%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-11.14%

+7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.36%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-2.91%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

2.61%

-1.94%

Volatility

XOCT vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October (XOCT) is 0.60%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that XOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOCTQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

4.21%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

11.30%

-7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

13.67%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.97%

14.75%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

14.75%

-7.78%

XOCT vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOCT vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

XOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%
XOCT
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOCT and QQQY have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to XOCT (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOCT dropped -10.00% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 12.27% for XOCT. On fees, XOCT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOCT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for XOCT.

XOCT is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XOCT and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOCT and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer