PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XNZN.DE

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
0.62%
6M
2.71%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XNZN.DE
Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
0.62%1.04%3.46%12.19%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%17.53%5.08%5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XNZN.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between XNZN.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZN.DE
XNZN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XNZN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNZN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNZN.DECEMT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.10

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

4.03

-3.75

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNZN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNZN.DE and CEMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZN.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

0.77

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.37

-0.04

Drawdowns

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum CEMT.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZN.DE and CEMT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZN.DECEMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-37.66%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-4.26%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.90%

-14.36%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.13%

-0.39%

-8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-7.08%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

1.16%

+3.68%

Volatility

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that XNZN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNZN.DECEMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

0.00%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

0.00%

+12.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

6.11%

+9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

14.61%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.11%

+0.01%

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNZN.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNZN.DE nor CEMT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNZN.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNZN.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

XNZN.DE tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZN.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNZN.DE and CEMT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer