PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNZE.L is traded in GBP, while JRDZ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDZ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XNZE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JRDZ.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.70%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.44%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XNZE.L and JRDZ.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZE.L

JRDZ.L
JRDZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZE.LJRDZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.14

Drawdowns

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZE.LJRDZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

Volatility

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNZE.LJRDZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDZ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNZE.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

XNZE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XNZE.L and JRDZ.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNZE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNZE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZE.L and 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNZE.L and JRDZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer