PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZE.L vs. EEI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNZE.L is traded in GBP, while EEI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EEI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XNZE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EEI.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.61%
6M
13.56%
1Y
22.61%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNZE.L
Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
0.28%18.74%1.88%16.90%12.01%
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
10.61%26.84%-7.65%5.93%9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XNZE.L and EEI.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022

0.71

The correlation between XNZE.L and EEI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNZE.L
EEI.L

Technology

22.6%
1.5%

Financial Services

20.5%
24.7%

Industrials

12.9%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
3.3%

Healthcare

10.6%
2.8%

Communication Services

6.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
8.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
4.8%

Utilities

2.4%
16.7%

Energy

-

11.6%

Technology

XNZE.L
22.6%
EEI.L
1.5%

Financial Services

XNZE.L
20.5%
EEI.L
24.7%

Industrials

XNZE.L
12.9%
EEI.L
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XNZE.L
11.9%
EEI.L
3.3%

Healthcare

XNZE.L
10.6%
EEI.L
2.8%

Communication Services

XNZE.L
6.7%
EEI.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

XNZE.L
6.4%
EEI.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

XNZE.L
3.6%
EEI.L
8.3%

Real Estate

XNZE.L
2.4%
EEI.L
4.8%

Utilities

XNZE.L
2.4%
EEI.L
16.7%

Energy

XNZE.L

-

EEI.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZE.L

EEI.L
EEI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZE.LEEI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

Drawdowns

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZE.LEEI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNZE.LEEI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EEI.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNZE.L vs. EEI.L - Dividend Comparison

XNZE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.07%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.05%0.04%0.03%0.04%
XNZE.L
Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNZE.L and EEI.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNZE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNZE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EEI.L.

XNZE.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while EEI.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZE.L and 0.29% for EEI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNZE.L and EEI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer