PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNZE.DE having a 9.92% return and XCTW.DE slightly lower at 9.85%.


XNZE.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
4.62%
YTD
9.92%
6M
10.75%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
10Y*

XCTW.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
3.46%
YTD
9.85%
6M
9.83%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XNZE.DE
Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
9.92%13.33%5.47%7.05%
XCTW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF
9.85%7.28%25.26%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XNZE.DE and XCTW.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.70

The correlation between XNZE.DE and XCTW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZE.DE
XNZE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XNZE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XCTW.DE
XCTW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XCTW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCTW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCTW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XCTW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCTW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNZE.DEXCTW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.94

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

11.85

-7.59

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNZE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the XCTW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNZE.DE and XCTW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZE.DEXCTW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.96

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.29

-0.64

Drawdowns

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNZE.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, smaller than the maximum XCTW.DE drawdown of -21.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZE.DE and XCTW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZE.DEXCTW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-21.64%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.49%

-7.72%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-21.64%

+4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.31%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-2.65%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.92%

+1.45%

Volatility

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCTW.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that XNZE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCTW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNZE.DEXCTW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

2.68%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

8.12%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

11.55%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

13.16%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

13.16%

+3.68%

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XCTW.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNZE.DE vs. XCTW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNZE.DE nor XCTW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNZE.DE and XCTW.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNZE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNZE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XCTW.DE.

XNZE.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XCTW.DE is Global Equities. XNZE.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XCTW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZE.DE and 0.19% for XCTW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNZE.DE and XCTW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer