PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNZE.DE
Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C
-3.50%13.33%5.47%20.66%-5.06%
XCTE.DE
Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C
-6.15%19.05%22.69%-18.15%-7.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNZE.DE achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly higher than XCTE.DE's -6.15% return.


XNZE.DE

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
-3.50%
6M
-2.61%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
10Y*

XCTE.DE

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
-6.15%
6M
-15.05%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XCTE.DE's 0.44% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZE.DE
XNZE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XNZE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNZE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XCTE.DE
XCTE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XCTE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNZE.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

0.19

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.07

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.42

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.60

0.80

+1.80

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNZE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the XCTE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNZE.DE and XCTE.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZE.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.19

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.03

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between XNZE.DE and XCTE.DE is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNZE.DE nor XCTE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNZE.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, smaller than the maximum XCTE.DE drawdown of -48.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZE.DE and XCTE.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZE.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-48.80%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.49%

-23.02%

+11.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-22.64%

+14.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-26.15%

+21.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

12.03%

-8.79%

Volatility

XNZE.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) at 5.74%. This indicates that XNZE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCTE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XNZE.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.74%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

25.64%

-15.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

31.52%

-15.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

30.59%

-13.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

30.59%

-13.97%