XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
XNZE.DE (Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XNZE.DE tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNZE.DE returned 11.48%/yr vs 29.89%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNZE.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNZE.DE achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return.
XNZE.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNZE.DE Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C | 9.92% | 13.33% | 5.47% | 20.66% | -1.63% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -7.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNZE.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XNZE.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNZE.DE
IBCJ.DE
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNZE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.90 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 9.60 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNZE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.65 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.15 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNZE.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNZE.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNZE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.68% | -56.11% | +37.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -9.96% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -18.47% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.16% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -19.38% | +15.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 4.05% | -0.68% |
Volatility
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers EMU Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZE.DE) is 5.15%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that XNZE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNZE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 7.13% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 17.61% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 23.48% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 26.72% | -9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 25.15% | -8.31% |
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNZE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNZE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNZE.DE nor IBCJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNZE.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNZE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNZE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
XNZE.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZE.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNZE.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer