XNTK vs. IETC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XNTK is passively managed, while IETC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNTK returned 21.11%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for IETC. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IETC.

Performance

XNTK vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's 12.03% return.

XNTK

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 18.67%
• YTD: 37.92%
• 6M: 36.17%
• 1Y: 73.92%
• 3Y*: 42.75%
• 5Y*: 21.11%
• 10Y*: 25.57%

IETC

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: 9.01%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 27.98%
• 3Y*: 29.91%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	37.92%	38.06%	23.49%	70.13%	-41.07%	17.63%	73.91%	38.08%	-12.37%
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	12.03%	19.56%	37.57%	54.35%	-32.78%	29.73%	46.59%	43.09%	-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and IETC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018	0.92

The correlation between XNTK and IETC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XNTK vs. IETC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XNTK	IETC
Technology	80.9%	79.1%
Communication Services	9.8%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	4.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.1%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XNTK vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK

XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 84
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IETC

IETC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNTK	IETC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	1.33	+1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	1.84	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.23	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	1.33	+3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	3.73	+10.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNTK vs. IETC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the IETC Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and IETC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNTK	IETC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	1.33	+1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.73	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.86	-0.41

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than IETC's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and IETC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNTK	IETC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.38%	-38.48%	-33.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.00%	-21.19%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.11%	-25.17%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	-38.48%	-9.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-3.84%	+2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-8.13%	-13.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.09%	7.51%	-2.42%

Volatility

XNTK vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) at 6.78%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNTK	IETC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.65%	6.78%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.06%	16.57%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.31%	21.09%	+2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.90%	24.53%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.63%	25.38%	+1.25%

XNTK vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNTK vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IETC's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	0.35%	0.38%	0.52%	0.79%	0.92%	0.73%	0.48%	0.95%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	0.17%	0.23%	0.42%	0.34%	0.85%	0.34%	0.30%	0.61%	29.64%	1.29%	0.81%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNTK and IETC in my portfolio?

XNTK and IETC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XNTK or IETC?

XNTK has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to IETC (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs IETC's -38.48%.

Which ETF is better, XNTK or IETC?

On 5-year performance, XNTK leads with 21.11% vs 17.84% for IETC. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IETC has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNTK or IETC?

Over the 5-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNTK or IETC?

IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNTK or IETC?

IETC has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.

What is the main difference between XNTK and IETC?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.18% for IETC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.