XNTK vs. GFGF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF).
XNTK and GFGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNTK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the NYSE Technology Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. GFGF is an actively managed fund by GuruFocus. It was launched on Dec 15, 2021.
Performance
XNTK vs. GFGF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNTK vs. GFGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | -8.10% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 3.43% |
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF | -10.95% | 13.11% | 26.12% | 24.03% | -20.32% | 2.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a -8.10% return, which is significantly higher than GFGF's -10.95% return.
XNTK
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -8.10%
- 6M
- -6.14%
- 1Y
- 33.43%
- 3Y*
- 28.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 20.88%
GFGF
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- YTD
- -10.95%
- 6M
- -6.60%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNTK vs. GFGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GFGF's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. GFGF — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
GFGF
XNTK vs. GFGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNTK | GFGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.20 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 0.42 | +1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.28 | +1.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 1.07 | +5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNTK | GFGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.20 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.31 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and GFGF is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XNTK vs. GFGF - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than GFGF's 0.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.25% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.42% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. GFGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than GFGF's maximum drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and GFGF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | GFGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -27.98% | -44.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -15.22% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -12.71% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.43% | -8.42% | -13.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 4.05% | +1.27% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. GFGF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) at 5.03%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | GFGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.87% | 5.03% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 9.61% | +8.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.96% | 16.99% | +11.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.76% | 19.33% | +8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 19.33% | +7.14% |