XNTK vs. GFGF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while GFGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GuruFocus. XNTK is passively managed, while GFGF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNTK returned 31.93%/yr vs 15.79%/yr for GFGF. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GFGF.

Performance

XNTK vs. GFGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than GFGF's 1.58% return.

XNTK

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -7.35%
• 6M: 19.74%
• YTD: 21.38%
• 1Y: 45.94%
• 3Y*: 31.93%
• 5Y*: 16.77%
• 10Y*: 23.46%
• ALL TIME*: 11.11%

GFGF

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -0.40%
• 6M: 2.49%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 1Y: 11.60%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	$312.56K	$152.76K	$61.08K
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	$14.59M	$14.88M	$19.50M

XNTK vs. GFGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	21.38%	38.06%	23.49%	70.13%	-41.07%	0.09%
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	1.58%	13.11%	26.12%	24.03%	-20.32%	1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and GFGF is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.76

The correlation between XNTK and GFGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. GFGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XNTK	GFGF
Technology	85.8%	35.2%
Communication Services	7.2%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	6.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	3.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	31.4%
Healthcare	-	14.8%
Industrials	-	2.0%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XNTK vs. GFGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNTK

XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 61
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GFGF

GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 28
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNTK vs. GFGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNTK	GFGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.76	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	1.11	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.14	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	0.64	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	2.17	+4.78

XNTK vs. GFGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the GFGF Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and GFGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. GFGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than GFGF's maximum drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and GFGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNTK	GFGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.38%	-27.98%	-44.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.65%	-15.22%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.11%	-15.60%	-12.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.74%	-0.90%	-12.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.21%	-8.05%	-13.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.15%	4.50%	+1.65%

Volatility

XNTK vs. GFGF - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) at 3.53%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNTK	GFGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.16%	3.53%	+7.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.16%	10.12%	+15.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.41%	12.95%	+16.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.01%	18.93%	+10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	18.93%	+8.24%

XNTK vs. GFGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GFGF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNTK vs. GFGF - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than GFGF's 0.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	0.21%	0.21%	0.10%	0.08%	0.42%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF	0.16%	0.23%	0.42%	0.34%	0.85%	0.34%	0.30%	0.61%	29.64%	1.29%	0.81%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNTK and GFGF in my portfolio?

XNTK and GFGF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XNTK or GFGF?

XNTK has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to GFGF (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs GFGF's -27.98%.

Which ETF is better, XNTK or GFGF?

On 3-year performance, XNTK leads with 31.93% vs 15.79% for GFGF. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GFGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNTK or GFGF?

Over the 3-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 31.93% return vs 15.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNTK or GFGF?

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GFGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNTK or GFGF?

GFGF has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.16% for XNTK.

What is the main difference between XNTK and GFGF?

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GFGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and GuruFocus. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.65% for GFGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.