PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XNTK vs. GFGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XNTK vs. GFGF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while GFGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GuruFocus. XNTK is passively managed, while GFGF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNTK returned 39.51%/yr vs 16.15%/yr for GFGF. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GFGF.

Performance

XNTK vs. GFGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 32.72% return, which is significantly higher than GFGF's -1.94% return.

XNTK

1D
-5.42%
1M
5.72%
YTD
32.72%
6M
30.83%
1Y
62.72%
3Y*
39.51%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
25.67%

GFGF

1D
-0.65%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.37%
1Y
8.97%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. GFGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF		32.72%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%0.09%
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF		-1.94%13.11%26.12%24.03%-20.32%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and GFGF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.78

The correlation between XNTK and GFGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. GFGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XNTK
GFGF

Technology

83.3%
36.0%

Communication Services

8.6%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

3.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

30.1%

Healthcare

-

14.1%

Industrials

-

2.4%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XNTK
83.3%
GFGF
36.0%

Communication Services

XNTK
8.6%
GFGF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
8.0%
GFGF
6.6%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

GFGF

-

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

GFGF
3.1%

Energy

XNTK

-

GFGF

-

Financial Services

XNTK

-

GFGF
30.1%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

GFGF
14.1%

Industrials

XNTK

-

GFGF
2.4%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

GFGF
2.0%

Utilities

XNTK

-

GFGF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF

Guru Favorite Stocks ETF

Often compared with XNTK:
XNTK vs. QQQXNTK vs. VGTXNTK vs. IYWXNTK vs. VOOXNTK vs. PNQIXNTK vs. OGIGXNTK vs. XSW
Often compared with GFGF:
GFGF vs. SPYGFGF vs. IWYGFGF vs. VGTGFGF vs. SCHGGFGF vs. VOOGFGF vs. BDGSGFGF vs. guru

Return for Risk

XNTK vs. GFGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
GFGF
GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. GFGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XNTKGFGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.36
0.71

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.84
1.05

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.13

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

0.59

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

2.01

+10.01

XNTK vs. GFGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the GFGF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and GFGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. GFGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than GFGF's maximum drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and GFGF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XNTKGFGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-27.98%

-44.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-15.22%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-15.60%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

-3.87%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-8.20%

-13.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

4.46%

+0.77%

Volatility

XNTK vs. GFGF - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) at 4.03%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XNTKGFGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

4.03%

+10.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.07%

9.95%

+12.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.71%

12.74%

+13.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

19.05%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

19.05%

+7.87%

XNTK vs. GFGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GFGF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNTK vs. GFGF - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than GFGF's 0.22% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF		0.22%0.21%0.10%0.08%0.42%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF		0.15%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

XNTK and GFGF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to GFGF (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs GFGF's -27.98%.

On 3-year performance, XNTK leads with 39.51% vs 16.15% for GFGF. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GFGF has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 39.51% return vs 16.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GFGF.

GFGF has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GFGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and GuruFocus. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.65% for GFGF.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and GFGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer