PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's 33.84% return.


XNTK

1D
-1.00%
1M
18.67%
YTD
37.92%
6M
36.17%
1Y
73.92%
3Y*
42.75%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
25.57%

AIQ

1D
-1.58%
1M
16.50%
YTD
33.84%
6M
33.72%
1Y
64.95%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
37.92%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-16.42%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
33.84%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and AIQ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.94

The correlation between XNTK and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XNTK vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
AIQ

Technology

80.9%
73.3%

Communication Services

9.8%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Industrials

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XNTK
80.9%
AIQ
73.3%

Communication Services

XNTK
9.8%
AIQ
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
9.3%
AIQ
8.5%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

AIQ

-

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

AIQ

-

Energy

XNTK

-

AIQ

-

Financial Services

XNTK

-

AIQ
0.4%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

AIQ
0.4%

Industrials

XNTK

-

AIQ
4.2%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

AIQ

-

Utilities

XNTK

-

AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNTKAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.96

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

13.69

+0.87

XNTK vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNTKAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.83

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.74

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-44.66%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-16.47%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-26.35%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-44.66%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-2.95%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-9.79%

-11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

4.76%

+0.33%

Volatility

XNTK vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is 7.65%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that XNTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

8.82%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

18.55%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

23.11%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.90%

25.34%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.63%

25.50%

+1.13%

XNTK vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.17%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XNTK and AIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to XNTK (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 5-year performance, XNTK leads with 21.11% vs 18.69% for AIQ. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XNTK has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 18.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.68% for AIQ.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer