XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNIF.L (Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XNIF.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD while PAXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNIF.L returned 3.30%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for PAXG.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNIF.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.

Performance

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNIF.L achieves a -16.13% return, which is significantly lower than PAXG.L's 8.84% return.

XNIF.L

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -3.90%
• YTD: -16.13%
• 6M: -16.53%
• 1Y: -14.54%
• 3Y*: -0.33%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: 7.18%

PAXG.L

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 6.05%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XNIF.L Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	-16.13%	-1.71%	6.70%	11.98%	5.08%	23.10%	6.44%	6.11%	-1.17%	23.90%
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS	8.84%	8.63%	1.48%	-3.00%	-0.45%	0.41%	0.63%	7.84%	-4.76%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XNIF.L and PAXG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2016	0.15

The correlation between XNIF.L and PAXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XNIF.L	PAXG.L
Technology	22.4%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	19.7%	6.0%
Communication Services	17.1%	2.7%
Financial Services	11.0%	46.1%
Healthcare	11.0%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	3.0%
Energy	5.4%	2.9%
Basic Materials	2.6%	14.6%
Industrials	2.3%	8.5%
Utilities	0.9%	3.6%
Real Estate	-	7.8%

Return for Risk

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNIF.L

XNIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
XNIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
XNIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2
XNIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
XNIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2

PAXG.L

PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNIF.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	1.22	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.33	1.78	-3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.23	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	1.83	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	4.61	-6.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNIF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNIF.L and PAXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNIF.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.96	1.22	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.17	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.35	-0.10

Drawdowns

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNIF.L drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNIF.L and PAXG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNIF.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.56%	-31.27%	-27.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.09%	-7.45%	-13.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.80%	-21.29%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.80%	-21.29%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.51%	-3.15%	-19.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.41%	-6.86%	-6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.94%	2.97%	+6.97%

Volatility

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XNIF.L) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that XNIF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNIF.L	PAXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	3.60%	+1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	8.91%	+3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	11.24%	+3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	17.63%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	23.15%	-2.77%

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNIF.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNIF.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison

XNIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS	0.03%	0.03%	0.06%	0.04%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.02%
XNIF.L Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNIF.L and PAXG.L in my portfolio?

XNIF.L and PAXG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNIF.L or PAXG.L?

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNIF.L or PAXG.L?

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XNIF.L.

What is the main difference between XNIF.L and PAXG.L?

XNIF.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XNIF.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.