PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNGS.L is traded in GBP, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNGS.L achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return.


XNGS.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
12.71%
YTD
17.59%
6M
15.55%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
10Y*

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNGS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
17.59%11.63%38.09%48.85%-12.98%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XNGS.L and IUIT.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.87

The correlation between XNGS.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNGS.L
XNGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XNGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XNGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNGS.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.32

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

8.42

-4.19

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNGS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNGS.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNGS.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.78

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.24

0.00

Drawdowns

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNGS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNGS.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNGS.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-28.01%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.19%

-16.96%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.85%

-28.01%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.78%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.29%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

6.70%

+1.35%

Volatility

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L) is 5.17%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that XNGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNGS.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

7.16%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

15.20%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

20.23%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

22.82%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

22.51%

-2.65%

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNGS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNGS.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNGS.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNGS.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNGS.L.

XNGS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNGS.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNGS.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer