XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNGI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XNGI.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNGI.DE returned 27.17%/yr vs 24.64%/yr for XNAS.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNGI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.

Performance

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNGI.DE achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.

XNGI.DE

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 11.22%
• YTD: 17.43%
• 6M: 15.47%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 27.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XNAS.DE

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 20.53%
• 6M: 18.71%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 18.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XNGI.DE Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	17.43%	7.77%	43.41%	52.53%	-14.06%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	20.53%	7.11%	33.75%	51.36%	-14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022	0.93

The correlation between XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNGI.DE

XNGI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 41
XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XNGI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XNGI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 46
XNGI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XNGI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

XNAS.DE

XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNGI.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.40	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.18	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.42	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	3.77	-2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	11.16	-7.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNGI.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.40	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.91	+0.29

Drawdowns

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNGI.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.91%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNGI.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.91%	-31.25%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.97%	-10.00%	-8.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.91%	-26.72%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-0.83%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-7.83%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	3.38%	+4.02%

Volatility

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) at 4.31%. This indicates that XNGI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNGI.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.48%	4.31%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	10.91%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.27%	15.71%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	19.88%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	19.84%	+0.86%

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNGI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNGI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNGI.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XNGI.DE or XNAS.DE?

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNGI.DE or XNAS.DE?

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XNGI.DE.

What is the main difference between XNGI.DE and XNAS.DE?

XNGI.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XNGI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XNGI.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.