XNET vs. SAABY
XNET (Xunlei Limited) and SAABY (Saab AB (publ)) are both stocks. XNET operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while SAABY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, XNET returned 0.66%/yr vs 50.56%/yr for SAABY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XNET vs. SAABY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNET achieves a -29.76% return, which is significantly lower than SAABY's -5.10% return.
XNET
- 1D
- -7.95%
- 1M
- -20.06%
- YTD
- -29.76%
- 6M
- -31.69%
- 1Y
- -14.29%
- 3Y*
- 51.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- -2.17%
SAABY
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -10.56%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 56.17%
- 5Y*
- 50.56%
- 10Y*
- —
XNET vs. SAABY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNET Xunlei Limited | -29.76% | 256.28% | 22.84% | -10.99% | -9.45% | -30.45% | -12.42% |
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | -5.10% | 177.56% | 39.85% | 47.07% | 67.28% | -48.79% | 82.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNET and SAABY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
XNET:
$62.71M
SAABY:
$29.71B
XNET:
$69.01
SAABY:
$5.98
XNET:
0.07
SAABY:
4.59
XNET:
0.00
SAABY:
0.14
XNET:
0.13
SAABY:
0.36
XNET:
0.05
SAABY:
0.67
XNET:
$470.70M
SAABY:
$82.29B
XNET:
$231.40M
SAABY:
$17.87B
XNET:
$1.09B
SAABY:
$9.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNET vs. SAABY — Risk / Return Rank
XNET
SAABY
XNET vs. SAABY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xunlei Limited (XNET) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNET | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.17 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 0.44 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNET | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 0.13 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 1.08 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.76 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
XNET vs. SAABY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNET drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than SAABY's maximum drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNET and SAABY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNET | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -52.75% | -43.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.80% | -37.04% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.80% | -37.04% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.46% | -37.04% | -44.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.01% | -32.29% | -47.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.74% | -16.90% | -57.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.46% | 14.20% | +19.26% |
Volatility
XNET vs. SAABY - Volatility Comparison
Xunlei Limited (XNET) has a higher volatility of 21.11% compared to Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) at 16.22%. This indicates that XNET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAABY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNET | SAABY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.11% | 16.22% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.41% | 32.73% | +6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.97% | 49.51% | +32.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.26% | 46.97% | +24.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.64% | 57.58% | +30.06% |
Dividends
XNET vs. SAABY - Dividend Comparison
XNET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAABY Saab AB (publ) | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.73% | 0.84% | 1.24% | 2.19% |
XNET Xunlei Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
XNET vs. SAABY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xunlei Limited and Saab AB (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
XNET and SAABY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNET has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to SAABY (16.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNET dropped -96.03% vs SAABY's -52.75%.
SAABY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNET and SAABY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer