XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and XSTR.L (Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XSTR.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Xtrackers. XNAS.L is passively managed, while XSTR.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAS.L returned 28.10%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for XSTR.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for XSTR.L.

Performance

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSTR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XNAS.L is traded in USD, while XSTR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than XSTR.L's 1.32% return.

XNAS.L

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 8.53%
• YTD: 19.67%
• 6M: 19.16%
• 1Y: 40.41%
• 3Y*: 28.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XSTR.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 2.60%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: 7.31%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 1.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	19.67%	19.83%	26.60%	56.41%	-1.82%
XSTR.L Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D	1.32%	12.06%	3.39%	10.09%	7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.L and XSTR.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022	0.21

Return for Risk

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.L

XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

XSTR.L

XSTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
XSTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XSTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XSTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XSTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
XSTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNAS.L	XSTR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	0.42	+2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	0.65	+2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.08	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	0.70	+2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	1.51	+11.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the XSTR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.L and XSTR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNAS.L	XSTR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	0.42	+2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	-0.17	+1.85

Drawdowns

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum XSTR.L drawdown of -46.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and XSTR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAS.L	XSTR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	-46.49%	+23.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-4.18%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	-8.00%	-14.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.22%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-21.26%	+20.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-31.11%	+28.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	1.94%	+1.11%

Volatility

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSTR.L) at 1.81%. This indicates that XNAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNAS.L	XSTR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	1.81%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	5.33%	+6.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	6.95%	+8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.39%	8.92%	+10.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.39%	9.56%	+9.83%

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTR.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XNAS.L vs. XSTR.L - Dividend Comparison

XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSTR.L Xtrackers II GBP Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1D	4.15%	4.61%	5.06%	4.05%	0.33%	0.02%	0.56%	0.97%	0.61%	0.19%	1.19%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAS.L and XSTR.L in my portfolio?

XNAS.L and XSTR.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNAS.L or XSTR.L?

On fees, XSTR.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAS.L or XSTR.L?

XSTR.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.L.

What is the main difference between XNAS.L and XSTR.L?

XNAS.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XSTR.L is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.L and 0.10% for XSTR.L.