XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L
XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XNAS.L is passively managed, while QQQY.L is actively managed. Over the past year, XNAS.L returned 40.41% vs 31.81% for QQQY.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNAS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQY.L.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY.L's 15.10% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 40.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 31.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 19.67% | 19.83% | 10.45% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 15.10% | 14.25% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and QQQY.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XNAS.L and QQQY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
QQQY.L
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.32 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 13.40 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.18 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 1.02 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than QQQY.L's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and QQQY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -19.23% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -7.34% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.93% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -3.18% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.37% | +0.68% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.78% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 10.22% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 14.52% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 20.98% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 20.98% | -1.59% |
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison
XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 67.73% | 120.60% | 18.65% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.L.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.L and 0.45% for QQQY.L.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.L and QQQY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer