PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-5.13%19.83%26.60%56.41%-1.82%
IUMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc
-2.64%17.81%31.88%9.83%4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than IUMO.L's -2.64% return.


XNAS.L

1D
3.29%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-5.13%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
10Y*

IUMO.L

1D
5.02%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XNAS.L and IUMO.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.L
XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IUMO.L
IUMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNAS.LIUMO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

0.82

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.29

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.95

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.04

7.90

+2.13

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.L and IUMO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNAS.LIUMO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.82

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.79

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.L and IUMO.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNAS.L nor IUMO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum IUMO.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and IUMO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XNAS.LIUMO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-33.75%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-12.66%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-5.65%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-8.60%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.62%

+0.33%

Volatility

XNAS.L vs. IUMO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) is 5.98%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that XNAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XNAS.LIUMO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

8.00%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

14.39%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

20.75%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

19.29%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

20.36%

-0.94%